Respiratory system impedance in different decubitus evaluated by impulse oscillometry in individuals with obesity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The body posture can influence gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and mucociliary clearance and different positions can be used as a therapeutic strategy to improve in gas exchange and can also help physiotherapists to assist patients who have difficult or restrictions to stay seated or the ones who stay in the same position for a long period. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different positions on respiratory system impedance in obese and eutrophic subjects, using Impulse Oscillometry System (IOS). METHODS: The IOS parameters were evaluated in seated (Se), right lateral decubitus (RL), left lateral decubitus (LL), and supine (Su). RESULTS: Sixty two volunteers were allocated in obese group (OG) or eutrophic group (EG) according to BMI. In seated position, OG showed higher impedance than EG for R5: 0.55 (0.31; 0.93) and 0.33 (0.24; 0.52); R20: 0.39 (0.23; 0.54) and 0.32 (0.03; 0.41); R5-R20: 0.13 (0.02; 0.47) and 0.01 (-0.08; 0.27); X5: -0.20 (-0.51; 0.16) and -0,10 (-0.016; -0.04); Fres: 20.59 (11.54; 36.45 and 10.69 (7.56; 24.7) (p<0.05) and the impedance were higher in the Su for both groups. Compared to Se, there were differences with Su (R5, R5-20, X5), with RL (R20), and with LL (R5, R20) for OG; and with Su (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres), with RL and LL (X5) for EG. Compared to Su, there were differences with RL and LL (R5-20, X5) for OG; and with RL (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres), and LL (R5-20, X5, Fres) for EG. There were no differences between RL and LL for OG and EG. CONCLUSION: The respiratory system impedance is increased in OG, with greater contribution of peripheral resistance. The higher values of resistance and reactance were obtained in the supine position, in both groups, with lower differences obtained in the right and left lateral decubitus.

Increased airway resistance can be related to the decrease in the functional capacity in obese women.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Obesity can increase the airways resistance, mainly in the periphery, leading to dyspnea perception that can impair the functional capacity. This study aimed to analyze if airways resistance could be related to the walking capacity of women with morbid obesity. METHODS: Thirty-seven women with grade III obesity in preoperative bariatric surgery were evaluated using the spirometry test, impulse oscillometry system (IOS), and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Additionally, data about their daily dyspnea perception and physical activity level were collected. RESULTS: Variables of the spirometry test did not detect ventilator disorders. Compared to the predicted values, the IOS identified significant increase in airways resistance (kPa/L/s) (R5: 0.36 (0.34; 0.36) and 0.53 (0.47; 0.61); R20: 0.30 (0.28; 0.30) and 0.41 (0.35; 0.45); R5-20: 0.06 (0.06; 0.06) and 0.14 (0.10; 0.15); X5: -0.03 (-0.04; -0.01) and -0.20 (-0.27; -0.18), respectively). The distance walked in the 6MWT, 491.4±60.4m was significantly correlated to R5 (rho = -0.41, p = 0.01), R5-20 (rho = -0.52, p = 0.001), and X5 (rho = 0.54, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: The IOS is able to identify changes in airway resistance even before the onset of symptoms. When evaluated by IOS women with severe obesity and normal spirometry exhibited central and peripheral airways obstruction. The correlations between the IOS and six-minute walk distance suggest that increased peripheral airways resistance could be related to worsening functional capacity.

Comparative evaluation of expiratory airflow limitation between patients with COPD and BE using IOS.

Impulse oscillometry (IOS) allows evaluation of the compartmentalized resistance and reactance of the respiratory system, distinguishing central and peripheral obstruction. The IOS measurements are getting attention in the diagnosis and differentiation of chronic respiratory diseases. However, no data are available in the literature to differentiate between COPD and BE using IOS parameters. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of IOS in the diagnosis of bronchiectasis non-cystic fibrosis (BE) in comparison to COPD. Whole breath, inspiration, expiration, and inspiratory-expiratory difference (Δ) were evaluated based on the IOS parameters: total resistance (R5), central airway resistance (R20), peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20), reactance (X5), reactance area (AX), and resonance frequency (Fres). Fifty-nine subjects (21 Healthy, 19 BE, and 19 COPD) participated in this study. It was observed a significant difference in the comparison of healthy and pulmonary disease groups (BE and COPD) for total breathing (R5-R20, X5, AX, and Fres), inspiratory phase (R5 and R5-R5), and expiratory phase (R5-R20 and X5). The comparison between BE and COPD groups showed significant difference in the expiratory phase for resistance at 5 and 20 Hz and, ΔR5 and ΔR20. The IOS evidenced an increase of R5, R20 and R5-R20 in patients with BE and COPD when compared to healthy subjects. Expiratory measures of IOS revealed increased airway resistance in COPD compared to BE patients who had similar FEV1 measured by spirometry, however, further studies are needed to confirm these differences.

Peak expiratory flow in obese subjects in different positions.

Objective: To analyze the peak expiratory flow (PEF) in obese subjects in standing (ST), seated (SE), supine (SU), prone (PR), and right and left lateral decubitus (RL and LL) positions. Methods: 36 obese volunteers, aged between 18 and 54 years, and nonsmokers, were evaluated by anthropometric data; spirometry; international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ); and PEF in ST, SE, SU, PR, RL, and LL positions, randomly. Results: The mean age was 27.3 ± 7.4 years and BMI of 38.7 ± 3.2 kg/m2; IPAQ results: active (50%), irregularly active (25%), very active (16.7%), and sedentary (08.3%); spirometry results: FVC = 100.33%, FEV1 = 92.83%, FEV1/FVC ratio = 0.95, FEF25-75% = 85.55%. The PEF (L/min) were within the normal range and there was no difference between the ST and SE (428.6 ± 100.9 and 430.0 ± 100.1). Comparing ST and SE to the other positions, in absolute and percent of predicted values (L/min and %), there was a decrease in the SU (85.4 ± 14.9), PR (401.1 ± 92.4 and 84.1 ± 14.4), RL (398.6 ± 94.7 and 83.3 ± 14.9) (p < 0.05), and there was no difference to SU (409.4 ± 102.8) and LL (410.3 ± 93.9 and 85.8 ± 14.5). Conclusion: The PEF of healthy obese are similar in the standing and seated positions. The PEF decreases in the lying positions, except for the LL, that could be used as an alternative for measurements.